A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Why is it a relevant case study | Collection scheme for food waste | Key indicators when available | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Area: Please select | Please write the main city here. In case of consortia / Regions, put the capital | Country | Population covered with biowaste collection | e.g. large cities, difficult areas, citizens engagement, capture rate results | food/garden waste streams: | Main scheme: please describe door to door (kerbside), bring banks, open, closed, user identification… | Use of compostable bags: not allowed, allowed, recommended | Collection frequency for food waste (or garden waste if commingled) | Capture rate of biowaste (kg/capita/year) calculated on the whole population covered | Capture rate of residual waste (kg/capita/year) calculated on the whole population covered | Average impurities in food waste (%) | Economics: possibily put collection costs for just biowaste (specify if €/t or €/capita), compared to overall costs for waste management of all fractions | Economc incentives: (e.g. PAYT etc) | |||||||||||||
3 | City | Milan | Italy | 1.400.000 | Large city, densely populated area covering 100% of households + large producers | Single stream food waste | kerbside | allowed and recommended | 2 times per week | 103 | 4,50% | Per capita overall cost: 226.72 € separate collection: 25.51 €/C - 8.22 €/T residual waste: 16.36 €/C - 8.33 €/T Source: https://bit.ly/35XwfZE | PAYT foreseen | ||||||||||||||
4 | Region | Aalesund | Norway | 56.000 | Mostly outermost areas with small towns, several islands, ferries | Single stream food waste | Kerbsides | Now only bags made of recykled plastics | every second week | 67 | N.A. | Collection costs; 55 €/t. Transport and treatmentcost at biogass plant 300 km away; 150 €/t | Only paying for mixed waste | ||||||||||||||
5 | Region | Barcelona | Catalonia | 7.000.000 | Average level of participation: 35% (up to 90% or more in door to door municipalities). Since 2004 it was established an environmental taxation system with a double incentive (tax and tax refund - we say "sticks and carrots") linked to the quantity and quality of biowaste collected by municipalities, which is supported with environmental taxation law, and traceability mechanism (more than 1.500 quality controls of biowaste separate collected per year) Source: https://bit.ly/3pbe6yM | Single stream food waste | 220 municipalities door to door 570 municipalities road container | Compulsory for most door to door municipalities. Recommended in most of road container municipalities | 3 times per week door to door Every day or every other day road containers | Door to Door: 120 Road containers: 50 Source: http://estadistiques.arc.cat/ARC/ | Average: 10 % Weighted Average: 13 % Door to Door Municipalities: 0% - 5% Source: https://bit.ly/3bZs7MB | Door to door overall cost: 68,4 €/C Road containers overall cost: 69,5 €/C Source: https://bit.ly/2Kup0Rp | Tax for Landfilling in 2020: 47,1 €/t and growing up; in 2023: 75 €/t Tax for Incineration in 2020: 23,6 €/t and growing up; in 2023: 37,5 €/t Tax refund (2020) Biowaste Treatment: 34 €/t Biowaste Collection: 12 €/t x fpopulation x f quality = (from 6 €/t to 54 €/t) Source: https://bit.ly/38Wj6BH | ||||||||||||||
6 | Consortium/County | Treviso | Italy | 557.325 | Contarina is the pioneer experience of separate collection of biowaste in Italy and introducing the PAYT fee to incentivize source separation and recycling. Farmers and agricultural practitioners can collect for free the compost after the treatment with their own professional means. | Single stream food waste | Door to door | Compostable bags certified UNI EN 13432 recommended | 2 times per week | 86,47 Source: https://bit.ly/39ImfVe | N.A. | Per capita overall cost: 122.66 € separate collection: 69.93 €/C -7.97 €/T residual waste: 18.26 €/C - 7.11 €/T Source: https://bit.ly/3oXLKZ2 | PAYT: the PAYT is made of fixed and non-fixed fees. The fixed fee is calculated on the number of family members and it covers administrative and operational costs. The non-fixed fee is calculated on the number of emptyings of the residual waste bin container, multiplied by the cost of the single emptying. | ||||||||||||||
7 | City | Sarriá Vell (Barcelona) | Catalonia | 9500 | The city of Barcelona is mostly covered by Bring point waste collection. Recently, some districts changed the system to door-to-door collection successfully. In Sarría impurities were lowered from 13.6% to below 0.9% | Single stream food waste (small amounts of green waste allowed) | Door-to-door | allowed and recommended | 4/week | 36.9 (2019) | 66.7 (2019) | <0.9% | Treatment costs residual waste: 206€/t, Treatment costs biowaste: 163/t€, https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/sarria-santgervasi/ca/noticia/nova-taxa-per-millorar-la-recollida-selectiva_890435 | Fixed fee for inhabitants coupled to water fee https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/ecologiaurbana/en/services/the-city-works/maintenance-of-public-areas/waste-management-and-cleaning-services/household-waste-collection/waste-fee | |||||||||||||
8 | City | Argentona | Catalonia | 12295 | The city of Argentona implemented a PAYT door-to-door collection system in 2010 in some areas and extended the system to the rest of the town in 2017. This increased total separate collection from 63.5% (2016) to 87.5% (2018), biowaste collection increased from 122 kg/cap/year to 150 kg/cap/year. Residual waste decreased from 197 kg/cap/year to 58 kg/cap/year. Impurities dropped from 5% to 2.5% | Single stream food waste (small amounts of green waste allowed) | Door-to-door | allowed and recommended | 3/week | 150 (2018) | 58 (2018) | 2,5 | Fix part: 95€/household/year, Variable part for bag purchase: Minimum Residual waste (bags): 119€/cap. (1 person Household) - 28€ (5 person household), Biowaste: no additional fee | PAYT - Costing of waste bags, http://argentona.cat/document.php?id=10772 | |||||||||||||
9 | City | Lübeck | Germany | 217200 | In 2018 the city of Lübeck started a large communication campaign to reduce impurities in biowaste in 2018 ("Wirfürbio" - A large group of municipalities joined). It was started a visual bin control system including a traffic light system for good or bad sorting including a non-collection of the bin with visibly high impurity content. Compared to the last waste analysis in 2012 impurities decreased from 2.9% to 2.1% (including around 35% paper which is not a problem) | Mixed food and garden waste | Door-to-door | not allowed, paper bags recommended | Biweekly | 73.5 (2018) | 200 (2018) | 1,2 | Fees are calculated per ordered bin volume (40 - 1100 L possible). Price: 0.145€/L/month | Reduced bin size for expensive waste fractions (residual waste) can reduce costs | |||||||||||||
10 | City | 2 Districts in Lübeck | Germany | ~ 150 | In 2019 a campaign was started with Hamburg University of Technology aiming at improving the quality and quantity of separated biowaste focussing on food waste. 2 areas comprising of only multi-family houses were chosen with around 150 inhabitants. A system was tested with which the regular biowaste bins were removed and instead each household received a small 5L collection bucket. These buckets were collected directly 3 times per week (in contrast to biweekly of the regular biowaste bin). Furthermore, it was accompanied by an intense information campaign and interviewing of the inhabitants. The personal collection led to a rise of the motivation of most of the inhabitants. The separation efficiency of food waste increased from around 10% up to 65%. The test lasted around 5 weeks. Afterwards inhabitants were allowed to keep the biowaste sorting buckets. Even one year later, food waste separation efficiency remained high at around 45%. Also impurities remained below 1% | Single stream food waste | Door-to-door | not allowed | 3/week | 48 (1 year after test) | 141 (1 year after test | <1% | Fees are calculated per ordered bin volume (40 - 1100 L possible). Price: 0.145€/L/month | Reduced bin size for expensive waste fractions (residual waste) can reduce costs | |||||||||||||
11 | Region | Greater Porto Area | Portugal | 39110 | Different territories covered (5 Municipalities involved). DtD separate collection for Food waste since 2018 covering dwelling houses (detached houses, townhouses), population covered: 34563; DtD for Garden waste (single stream), weekly collection, covering 4548 inhabitants; the DtD collection of Garden waste is carried out with reusable bags with user identification (RFID system); For Large Producers: DtD Food waste, since 2005, covering almost 2200 establishment from HoReCa sector, canteens, catering service, etc. Bring bank system for Garden waste (879 street containers with 1100 l capacity each, open system) ; For Garden waste is possible to have on demand service with reusable bags provided, free of charge, by Lipor/municipalities, more than 13400 reusable bags with user identification were delivered for that service. | Single stream Food Waste and Single stream for GardenWaste | Door to Door, containers/bins with user identification | not allowed | Food Waste: 2 or 3 time/week ; Garden waste (single stream): 1/week | DtD Food waste HH: 57 kg/cap/year (2020) , DtD Large Producers, DtD Food waste (2020): 7,9tons/establishement/year ; DtD Garden waste (1819 Households): 133kg/cap/year (2020) | n.a | DtD HH: less than 5% ; DtD Large Producers: less than 5% | Collection costs: n.a (Munipalities responsibility) ; treatment cost at Composting plant (in-vessel system): 50€/t | Payt foreseen (by 2025) | |||||||||||||
12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 |